There’s a quiet truth about backpack size that most people only learn the hard way:
Bigger isn’t better, it’s just easier to overpack.
Choosing the right volume isn’t about chasing numbers; it’s about understanding what you actually carry, how you pack, how you move, and where you're headed.
Start With This: What Are You Actually Carrying?
Before you look at litres, look at your gear reality.
A weekend hut hike is not the same as a multi-day traverse.
A shared tent is not the same as going solo.
An inflatable mattress packs differently to a foam pad.
The most grounded way to figure this out is simple:
-
Gather your base gear (everything except food and water)
-
Pack it tightly into a box
-
Measure the volume (volume (L) = length x height x width / 1000)
That number is your true baseline; not a guess, not a marketing spec, but your actual kit in real space.
From there, you build up.
Add What Changes: Food and Water
Food is the biggest variable.
A useful rule:
-
1.2 to 1.8 litres of food per day
So if your longest trip is five days, you’re adding roughly:
-
6 to 9 litres of food volume
Water depends on your setup:
-
Bottle pockets; don’t count it, as generally side pockets aren't included in the quoted volume of a pack
-
Hydration bladder; include it in your volume
Now you’ve got a realistic total; grounded in how you actually hike.
The Part Most People Get Wrong
Once you have your number, the instinct is to size up.
That’s where things go sideways.
A pack that’s too big doesn’t just leave empty space, it loses structure.
And when a pack loses structure, it loses comfort.
A tightly packed bag carries better; it holds its shape, it moves with you.
That’s why ultralight packs tend to run smaller:
-
They encourage you to pack intentionally
-
They compress properly
-
They stay comfortable under load
A full small pack carries better than a half-empty big one.
The Reality Check (Keep This Simple)
If you ignore everything else, keep this:
-
Day hikes: 20–30L
-
Weekend (1–3 nights): 40–50L
-
Multi-day (3–5 nights): 50–65L
That’s where most hikers land; not because it’s a rule, but because it works.
For most setups, something like the Oryx 44L sits comfortably in that weekend to light multi-day range, while the Oryx 52L gives you a bit more margin for longer food carries or colder conditions without stepping into overbuilt territory.
Why Smaller Often Wins
Going slightly smaller does two important things:
-
It forces clarity
You take what you need, not what might be nice -
It improves carry comfort
A packed bag is stable; an empty one collapses
There’s also more flexibility than people think:
-
External pockets
-
Front mesh
-
Shock cord storage
Ultralight packs are intentionally simple inside; no internal dividers, no unnecessary compartments. That’s where a system like ultralight colour-coded compression stuff sacks comes into its own. Using a mix of large and small sacks lets you organise your kit cleanly while still packing tightly and efficiently.
Bulky, low-risk items can live outside the main pack; things like rain gear or quick-access layers can be stored in outer bungee lacing; removable shoulder strap or hip belt pockets are great for keeping essentials close without eating into your main volume.
If You’re Between Sizes
This is where your philosophy shows.
Want to go lighter, cleaner, more intentional?
Choose the smaller pack.
Want comfort items, margin, a bit of luxury?
Choose the larger one.
Neither is wrong; but they lead to very different experiences on the trail.
A Final Thought
Most hikers don’t need a bigger pack.
They need a better understanding of their gear.
Because once you know what you actually carry, the right volume becomes obvious; and usually smaller than you expected.